skip to main | skip to sidebar

The Death of Art

A discussion on the uselessnes of art.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Both art pieces are repugnant and very unpleasent to the eye, I think that the art in both are really rejecting the aesthetic criteria or art. Both don’t try to balance both don’t try to ceate interesting line, both rely solely on nothing to generate good art. Both pieces of art tried to destroy art. I think they both really aid people lose their urge to look at good art.
Posted by Parth Doshi at 9:43 PM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2009 (14)
    • ▼  March (14)
      • Dada Art versus Bad Art
      • Mocking Normal art
      • Both art pieces are repugnant and very unpleasent ...
      • Art is not bad art when it simply just looks disgu...
      • I agree with Shilpa -- bad art can simply be a moc...
      • Marchel Duchamp’s “Fountain” Is not just a piece o...
      • Artwork that simply ignores all aesthetic criteria...
      • I think the difference between making bad artwork ...
      • <!--[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 ...
      • Artwork can either intentionally ignore the princi...
      • The difference between purposefully rejecting art ...
      • The Difference between purposely reject existing c...
      • I think there is a significant difference between ...
      • The art that has purposely rejected the aesthetic ...