As noticed I used the same artwork as I did in the previous question. As I said before, this painting is simple, and destroys the expression and the meaning of art; sending a message to an audience. Although it is bad, it well destroys meaning and expression of art, and that itself is a message. In the ‘BAD’ art it uses more elements of design and principles of design, but has no message what-so-ever. And if the artist was a Dada artist, he aim of destroying art would’ve been unsuccessful. Comparing the two paintings the dada art is simple and uses no elements of design and principles of design sending no message, but because he doesn’t use the elements of deisng and the principles of design shows a message, about art having no message. The second piece of artwork is trying to send a message, but is having trouble delivering, what makes this artwork bad is its lack of use of the elements of design and the principles of deisgn and in the end delivers no message.
No comments:
Post a Comment