skip to main | skip to sidebar

The Death of Art

A discussion on the uselessnes of art.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

I agree with Shilpa -- bad art can simply be a mockery of other forms of art and it is different from art that wishes to state something completely random or obscure. Art that intentionally forgets about or ignores certain aesthetic criterions is not the same as art that is made to be 'bad'.
Posted by Mallika Srinivasan at 9:28 PM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2009 (14)
    • ▼  March (14)
      • Dada Art versus Bad Art
      • Mocking Normal art
      • Both art pieces are repugnant and very unpleasent ...
      • Art is not bad art when it simply just looks disgu...
      • I agree with Shilpa -- bad art can simply be a moc...
      • Marchel Duchamp’s “Fountain” Is not just a piece o...
      • Artwork that simply ignores all aesthetic criteria...
      • I think the difference between making bad artwork ...
      • <!--[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 ...
      • Artwork can either intentionally ignore the princi...
      • The difference between purposefully rejecting art ...
      • The Difference between purposely reject existing c...
      • I think there is a significant difference between ...
      • The art that has purposely rejected the aesthetic ...