I think the difference between making bad artwork and a bad artwork in general is more than just the final product. Basically, wanting to do bad artwork on purpose is DADAism. That is when you try to break all the rules of principles of design and the other things that make up art (such as balance, color, line, texture, unity, etc.). DADA Artists try ignoring those rules or not include them at all in their art works.
In just bad art, artists mostly do not intent to make it bad. They create art like any other artist, however, to many people it just doesn’t seem appealing. The Artist might like the way it looks, but it doesn’t mean that everyone else likes the way it looks.
In just bad art, artists mostly do not intent to make it bad. They create art like any other artist, however, to many people it just doesn’t seem appealing. The Artist might like the way it looks, but it doesn’t mean that everyone else likes the way it looks.
2 comments:
I agree with the idea that the intention for Dada art is to do bad artwork, ignoring principles of design. Bad art is more of an opinion than a label for art.
I think that your right because you wrote a similar thing to mine. I also think that DADA is meant to be bad and "bad" art just happens to be bad.
Post a Comment